For SEO Teams
Three roles. One shared context.
Your technical owner, keyword strategist and content editor each open a different view of the same project — and every finding one of them makes becomes work the next one can pick up.
- Audit, research, editor and tracking on one project
- Findings arrive as scoped work with an owner
- Every change is reviewed before it ships
semurai.com
Monday, 09:12
71
Site health
+18 available
Weighted issues, biggest first — with the URL count that makes each one worth doing.
Audit Missing title tag 412 URLs · -20 pts each
Audit No canonical tag 508 URLs · -15 pts each
Audit Slow LCP template Category pages · 1 template
Tracker Drop on /collections 14 keywords, last 3 days
Same project, same data — three ways in.
Interactive
The loop your week already runs on.
Most SEO teams do these four things anyway. The difference is whether each stage hands the next one real context — or a spreadsheet and a meeting.
Measure feeds detect
Technical owner
Find what is actually costing you.
A crawl scores every page and weights each issue by severity and how many URLs it touches, so the list is already ordered by impact rather than by check name.
Comes in as
A domain
Leaves as
Weighted issue list
Site health 71 106 findings across 1 793 URLs
Handoff
Follow one finding all the way through.
The gap between tools is where SEO work usually dies. Here a single audit finding stays the same object as it moves from technical to content to review to measurement.
- No re-briefing between people or tools
- The original context travels with the task
- Nothing publishes without a human approving it
Finding lifecycle Duplicate title tags · 23 URLs
Audit
Audit flags 23 duplicate titles
Product pages sharing a title template, worth 20 points each on the pages affected. Grouped as one finding rather than 23 rows.
Technical ownerReporting
Report with the numbers you planned with.
The awkward part of SEO reporting is usually that the planning numbers and the reporting numbers come from different places. Here they are the same four signals, before and after.
- Health, issues, pages and positions in one review
- Before and after on the same scale, not two exports
- Every number links back to the work that moved it
Sprint review Last 30 days
Site health
Open findings
Pages refreshed
Priority ranks
Each row opens the underlying URLs, so "health went up" is a claim someone can actually check.
Control
AI does the drafting. Your team keeps the decisions.
An SEO team cannot hand a live site to something that publishes on its own. Semurai is built so the interesting work is proposed and the risky work is approved.
Generated metadata, rewrites and schema arrive as proposals with a clear accept, edit or reject step.
Findings carry an owner and an effort estimate, so the technical queue and the content queue stay separate.
Drafts keep version history and tracked pages keep 30 days of position data, so a regression is traceable.
Actions apply to the passage, layer or batch you chose, rather than rewriting a page you did not ask about.
The point is not to remove the SEO team. It is to stop them spending the week assembling context instead of using it.
FAQ
Common questions
Does this replace our existing SEO tools?
It covers the core loop — technical audit, keyword research, competitor gaps, content optimisation and rank tracking — in one project. Teams usually keep a log analyser or an enterprise crawler for edge cases, but the weekly loop stops needing four tabs and a spreadsheet to reconcile them.
How big does the team need to be?
The three roles are hats, not headcount. A solo SEO wears all three and benefits most from the handoffs disappearing; a larger team benefits from everyone reading the same prioritisation instead of arguing from separate exports.
How is ownership handled?
Findings carry an owner and an effort estimate, so a template performance issue lands with engineering while a thin-content issue lands with content. Each person sees their own queue rather than one shared list nobody triages.
What does onboarding look like?
Add a project, point it at the domain, and connect the keywords you already track. The first crawl and keyword pull establish a baseline, and from that point the loop runs on its own cadence.
Can I report to stakeholders from this?
Yes. The sprint review uses the same four signals you planned with — site health, open findings, pages refreshed and ranking movement — and each one opens the URLs behind it, so the numbers hold up when someone asks.
Does it work across multiple clients?
Each site is its own project with its own audit, keywords, brand context and tracking, so agency work stays separated. If you run several clients, the agencies solution page covers that setup in more detail.
Give your SEO team one loop instead of four tools.
Connect discovery, prioritisation, content and tracking on one project — and start the week already knowing what matters.